Flexible candidate scheduling
Candidates record their answers at any time that suits them — evenings, weekends, lunch breaks — without needing to match a recruiter's calendar. This widens the pool to people who cannot take daytime calls at work.
A plain-language definition, the real trade-offs, and a faster, fairer alternative built for modern hiring.
Asynchronous video interviewing (also called one-way video interviewing) is a screening method where candidates record video answers to pre-set questions on their own schedule — without a live interviewer present. Recruiters review the recordings later. It replaces the back-and-forth of scheduling live phone screens, giving candidates flexibility and giving hiring teams a consistent first-round filter before investing time in two-way conversations.
Coordinating live phone screens across time zones is one of the biggest scheduling drains in high-volume recruiting. Async video tools emerged as a fix: candidates record whenever it suits them, recruiters batch-review on their own schedule, and both sides avoid the calendar chaos of live coordination. The format spread quickly during remote-hiring growth and is now a standard part of many screening workflows — though it comes with its own usability challenges for candidates.
Candidates record their answers at any time that suits them — evenings, weekends, lunch breaks — without needing to match a recruiter's calendar. This widens the pool to people who cannot take daytime calls at work.
Every candidate receives exactly the same prompts in the same order, removing the interviewer-to-interviewer variation that skews live phone screens. Consistency makes comparisons fairer and defensible.
Recruiters can review dozens of recordings in a fraction of the time that scheduling and running live screens would take, compressing the early-stage pipeline from weeks to days.
Recorded responses can be shared with hiring managers or other stakeholders for a second opinion without re-interviewing the candidate, keeping everyone aligned on the same evidence.
No calendars to coordinate, no no-shows to reschedule, no time-zone arithmetic. The logistical work of first-round screening drops significantly for recruiting teams.
Whether you are screening 20 candidates or 2,000, the async format applies the same process uniformly, making it especially practical for high-volume roles like retail, BPO, or seasonal hiring.
Build your question set
The recruiter writes a fixed list of questions — typically four to eight — that every candidate will answer. Questions can target skills, situational judgment, availability, or culture fit.
Invite candidates to record
Candidates receive a link and complete the interview on their own device and schedule. They record a video answer to each question, usually within a set time limit per response.
Reviewers watch the recordings
Recruiters or hiring managers log in to the platform and review each recording at a time of their choosing. Most platforms let them rate or comment on individual responses.
Shortlist and move forward
Based on their review, the team advances strong candidates to the next stage — a live interview, skills assessment, or offer — while declining others with a templated message.
In an async (one-way) interview, only the candidate is present — they record answers to pre-set questions and no interviewer joins. In a live video interview both parties are on the call at the same time. Async formats are used for screening; live formats are typically used for deeper evaluation after screening.
Most platforms require only a smartphone or laptop with a working camera and microphone — no downloads or specialist hardware. Candidates should be in a quiet, well-lit space. Criba's voice-first approach removes the video requirement entirely, so any phone will do, lowering the bar further.
A typical async video interview takes 15–30 minutes depending on the number of questions and the allowed response length. Criba's AI screening interview is designed to take around 5 minutes — significantly shorter and less intimidating than a traditional recorded-video format.
Consistency in questions improves fairness compared to unstructured live screens, but candidates who feel uncomfortable on camera can be disadvantaged. Criba addresses this by using voice rather than video, reducing camera anxiety, and focusing purely on what candidates say rather than how they look.
Many platforms offer ATS integrations, though depth varies. Criba is designed to work alongside your existing ATS rather than replace it — it handles the screening bottleneck and passes a ranked shortlist (Pass / Borderline / Reject) back into your workflow without disrupting the rest of your stack.
Traditional async video platforms record video responses and rely on human review. Criba conducts a short, voice-first AI interview (about 5 minutes), scores candidates automatically, and delivers a ranked shortlist with every score linked to direct candidate quotes — so you get speed, explainability, and a fairer experience for candidates who find video uncomfortable.